The proposed redevelopment of the Angel Centre in Tonbridge represents a significant investment in local infrastructure. While the plans offer modernised facilities and potential improvements to some areas of the centre, they have also sparked considerable debate among local residents and user groups. Specifically, there are concerns that the design prioritises commercial fitness provision at the expense of versatile, dedicated community space. Below are the key points raised by the u3a regarding the impact of these plans (Application reference: 26/00424/DR3) on the wider community.
1. The Loss of Medway Hall
The Medway Hall is the only large-scale community space in the town centre, capable of seating over 200 people. The new design offers no equivalent. Although developers suggest combining smaller studios with folding partitions, this would only accommodate 120 people—barely half the required capacity for u3a monthly meetings.
2. Drastic Reduction in Community Space
Community meeting space is set to be cut by 62.5% in terms of the number of rooms and 40% in total floor area. The existing eight dedicated spaces would be replaced by just three studios, all of which must be shared with commercial fitness programmes.
3. Failure to Meet Planning Policy CP26
Adopted planning law requires that community facilities only be lost if an alternative of “equivalent or better quality and scale” is provided. A 62.5% reduction in rooms and the loss of the town’s primary civic hall appear to directly contradict Policy CP26.
4. Imbalance of Provision
The proposed gym occupies 541 m², making it 52% larger than all three community studios combined. With the entire first floor dedicated to commercial fitness and zero community space provided on that level, the building’s primary purpose is called into question.
5. Inadequate Design for Accessibility
The proposed use of folding partitions presents a major barrier for those with hearing aids, as fitness music (often 80–90 dB) easily penetrates such barriers. Additionally, the floor tracks required for these partitions can create obstacles for wheelchair users.
6. Lack of Legally Secured Hire Rates
While council officers have offered verbal assurances that hire rates will remain affordable, there is currently no written commitment or Section 106 obligation. Without these, there is no protection against future price hikes.
7. Flawed Consultation Process
The public consultation was held during half-term without evening sessions. Critically, room sizes were not initially shown, and residents were never explicitly asked if they consented to such a significant reduction in community infrastructure.
8. Misjudging Future Demand
Despite claims that demand may be falling, the u3a has seen over 200 new members in the last year, with recent meetings exceeding safe capacity. With new retirement housing in the pipeline, the need for space is growing, not shrinking.
9. Unsuitability for Social Events
Traditional community events—such as fairs, cabaret-style socials, and open days—require versatile spaces. Modern fitness studios, fitted with mirrors and bars, are not conducive to the varied social functions currently hosted at the centre.
10. Reduction in Court Sports
The sports hall is set to shrink from six courts to four. This one-third reduction impacts badminton, netball, and basketball—activities that are vital for the physical and cognitive health of older residents.
11. Uncertainty for GP Referrals
The Angel Centre currently hosts a vital GP exercise referral programme. To date, there has been no written confirmation that this prescribed health provision will be protected or continued in the new building.
12. Unrealistic Alternative Venues
The council has suggested the rugby club or the River Centre as alternatives. However, the rugby club is seasonal and more expensive, while the River Centre’s high daily rates make it entirely unaffordable for voluntary organisations.
13. Threat to Digital Inclusion
The u3a provides essential digital skills training for older residents. These sessions require quiet, dedicated environments. The proposed shared-use studios, likely plagued by background noise from adjacent gym classes, are unsuitable for this learning.
14. Impact on Loneliness and Social Connection
Community spaces are the “social infrastructure” that combats loneliness. Reducing meeting space by over 60% in a town with a growing older population directly undermines national strategies to keep residents connected.
15. Risks to Voluntary Groups
Every group that meets at the Angel Centre has a story regarding why their specific space works. If these spaces are lost or become unaffordable, many of these volunteer-led groups may simply cease to exist.
16. Impact on Carers and Families
The reduction in provision disproportionately affects those who depend on community groups for respite, social connection, and mental health support. The loss of this hub affects entire family networks, not just the individual users.
17. Loss of Town Centre Parking
Building on the Sovereign Way Mid Car Park will remove 118 public parking spaces. This loss will make the town centre less accessible for those with limited mobility who rely on parking close to the entrance.
18. Value for Public Money
The budget for the new Angel Centre is approximately £19 million. Residents are entitled to expect that such a significant investment of public money delivers a building that genuinely serves the whole community for the next 50 years.
Angel Centre is a landmark project for Tonbridge
The proposed redevelopment of the Angel Centre is a landmark project for Tonbridge, representing a significant investment that could modernise the town’s facilities for decades to come. However, for this project to be a true success, it must balance commercial aspirations with the essential civic needs of the community it serves. By addressing these 18 points of concern—particularly regarding the preservation of large-scale meeting spaces, legal protection for hire rates, and guaranteed accessibility—the council has an opportunity to ensure that the new centre remains an inclusive and vibrant hub for all residents. Ultimately, a £19 million public investment should not only provide a modern gym but also protect the social fabric and community connections that the Angel Centre has fostered for generations.
Follow Us On Instagram Or Facebook Below To Receive Tonbridge Bean News.
Do you have something you want to tell the Tonbridge Bean about our town? Please share any thoughts and photos no matter how small, we love all Tonbridge news.
Have you subscribed?
Get our weekly newsletter, including a curated list of events for the weekend, straight to your inbox.
Bringing you all the latest news and events in Tonbridge.
Leave a Reply